🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.